Interesting viewpoints. We agree to disagree.
If you want a car based analogy, here's what you did. You gave an envelope full of cash to a guy on the understanding he'd come back later with a car for you. He didn't, so now you're blaming the Bank of England for printing the money, and you want the money back from your bank that you took the case out of because you didn't receive your goods.
Can you cite an example of this, please?
but by your logic. if i were to say buy a car from a ford dealer, my bank transferd the money to the dealer. the dealer then sends the money to ford, but ford never sent me the car, i would have to take that up directly with ford and not the dealer?
If you want a car based analogy, here's what you did. You gave an envelope full of cash to a guy on the understanding he'd come back later with a car for you. He didn't, so now you're blaming the Bank of England for printing the money, and you want the money back from your bank that you took the case out of because you didn't receive your goods.
also if i had evidence that the "cheque" that was sent to a person was for goods that never arrived, then yes my bank would retrieve that money also..
Can you cite an example of this, please?