I must say I am surprised by how many shared traditional thinking about breaking from the union. Sure, no union / organisation is perfect, and every union / organisation is doomed to failure, because human beings are imperfect. Favouring separation by making a new, better union is actually good, healthy thing, but here are expressed ideas of nationalism, which IMHO is wrong in this day and age.
Does humanity as a whole gain anything by posing virtual boundaries such as national borders, currencies, nationalism, regionalism and religion? Are we back in the 20th century or even further back? Oh, right, we favour gadgets from '80s.
I am saddened by the reactionist view of immigrants. We all were immigrants once, came from Africa to settle in Europe. Of course not all immigrants are nice and humble, some are lazy, greedy and will stab you in the back, but so are some natives, whoever native is. Classifying all immigrants as bad is bad. I am not naive in thinking that immigrants will be better for the country/economics/whatever in the long run, but they are human beings being toyed by politicians, corporations, and warmongers. Think if the situation was reversed.
Funny thing is reasoning of breaking up - because other countries forced conflicting decisions on the UK, which I find hard to believe, because UK is (was?) one of the major powers in the EU. Of course in every union everyone has to make a sacrifice. If you are led to believe UK had to make the most sacrifices, then you must have elected the worst politicians to represent your views in the EU. Don't you think these politicians will badly run the independent UK? Wouldn't it be better to just replace the politicians?
No man is an island, and neither is UK.