Gunstarrhero
New member
has anyone tried to get the raspberry pi to run interface with the amiga like a vampire card? i know you can emulate, is it possible to interface and run it like a vampire to the 68k? or to upload 68k cores or images to it instead of going through winuae? is that even possible, has anyone built a hardware level bridge through software or a physical bridge? if it emulates, isnt the 68k code present in the software?
ok so i took a very good look at the pi, i think its funny how the pi and the vampire are the same cards with features include/exclude here and there minus the fpga.
30$ or 300$. if someone could get the pi running the same as the vampire, we'd be saving a hell of a lot more money for the same features, plus usb, and ethernet. and, that 40 pin header can be used to bridge type.
instructions are instructions, write instructions point from the pi to the amiga, telling the amiga what to do, just as you would the pi to pi internal structure. leave port open on GPIO for others the same. thats what its for, i know its for programming the type, you dont have to just program from it, you could just use it as a connect to connect (P2P) connection over the hardware sending instructions back and forth.
i know it doesnt have an fpu, well that can be taken care of, cause the vampire doesnt have one either, it runs better on that level, that is because of the 060 dump they use. grab that dump and put it on the pi. its not an fpga, although you can still use the sd card slot. write it to that, point to the sd. its more than enough. put it on a usb flash drive or thumb drive. there are many more options here than the vampire i belive. whats the major difference? they can boat onto chip. well you can with the pi, all it takes is a proper pinout from GPIO. get an ide cable that allows 2 connections, strap up to the other type running we'll say the arm as an fpu, get a block header and strap up to well say a (id love for someone to dump ppc instructions) a ppc on the arm(its arm, however completely hypothetical, why not?) how about programming one for 3d acceleration? how about another for sound card process? sure you can use one pi for all that on a quad core, why? why not separate and let sit separate?
im sure someone will tell me that they arent the same, etc. i looked at the vampire and the pi, and they are more similar than not.
i just ask that you be objective about this.
ok so i took a very good look at the pi, i think its funny how the pi and the vampire are the same cards with features include/exclude here and there minus the fpga.
30$ or 300$. if someone could get the pi running the same as the vampire, we'd be saving a hell of a lot more money for the same features, plus usb, and ethernet. and, that 40 pin header can be used to bridge type.
instructions are instructions, write instructions point from the pi to the amiga, telling the amiga what to do, just as you would the pi to pi internal structure. leave port open on GPIO for others the same. thats what its for, i know its for programming the type, you dont have to just program from it, you could just use it as a connect to connect (P2P) connection over the hardware sending instructions back and forth.
i know it doesnt have an fpu, well that can be taken care of, cause the vampire doesnt have one either, it runs better on that level, that is because of the 060 dump they use. grab that dump and put it on the pi. its not an fpga, although you can still use the sd card slot. write it to that, point to the sd. its more than enough. put it on a usb flash drive or thumb drive. there are many more options here than the vampire i belive. whats the major difference? they can boat onto chip. well you can with the pi, all it takes is a proper pinout from GPIO. get an ide cable that allows 2 connections, strap up to the other type running we'll say the arm as an fpu, get a block header and strap up to well say a (id love for someone to dump ppc instructions) a ppc on the arm(its arm, however completely hypothetical, why not?) how about programming one for 3d acceleration? how about another for sound card process? sure you can use one pi for all that on a quad core, why? why not separate and let sit separate?
im sure someone will tell me that they arent the same, etc. i looked at the vampire and the pi, and they are more similar than not.
i just ask that you be objective about this.
Last edited: