I have opened up my A1200 quite a lot recently, but I keep on forgetting to check what the revision number is. I checked it today and was suprised to find that it was a revision 2B. The machine was purchased in the third month of release, early December 1992, marked as a UK produced unit, and arrived before retailers even had the 'Desktop Dynamite' pack. Does the same higgledy piggledy allocation of new and older parts that applied to the A500 series apply to the A1200? And were the 2B boards in circulation right from the initial release? And is 2B necessarily a progression from other numbered boards, or just a variant?
I have to admit that I have never been particularly happy with my A1200. I never found it to be that reliable, and the power supply that came with it was pathetic. While my A500 would crash every now and then, I always felt there were software reasons for this. With my A1200 I always felt there were underlying hardware issues that caused problems on top of the usual software issues. It was not until I picked up chunkier A500 power supply (I think one of the earliest ones that reuse a Commodore 128 power supply case?) that the machine really seemed to run stable at all. And by that time I had moved on to PCs.
I have to admit that I have never been particularly happy with my A1200. I never found it to be that reliable, and the power supply that came with it was pathetic. While my A500 would crash every now and then, I always felt there were software reasons for this. With my A1200 I always felt there were underlying hardware issues that caused problems on top of the usual software issues. It was not until I picked up chunkier A500 power supply (I think one of the earliest ones that reuse a Commodore 128 power supply case?) that the machine really seemed to run stable at all. And by that time I had moved on to PCs.