nothing f'ing works!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Justin
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 38
  • Views Views 1005
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

JuvUK said:
hi all,
@kinny poos, just bought a 1D4 board m8, ditching the 2b's i have here (they're shite!) and just sent the Apollo for to big Zeety-baby to work his magic. but Kin i REALLY appriciate your VERY kind offer m8.

but this is AmiRant not AmiNice (hmmmmm AmiNice? a new section maybe? :wink: ) so let's get back to ranting!, Imnogeek i understand what you are saying but i must say my PC ROCKS!!! never gives me any trouble just runs and runs and runs, plays everything i chuck at it (and i do ask it to do a lot!) my Wii on the other hand sux the big one, bloody black screen of death! (very common btw google it!) 360 also rocks! master system (which i still haven't given to the sister in law) works well (thanks Scrappy-chappy) but it does look and sound poo (don't flame me it just my personal opinion)

oh and while i'm at it Smug Jobworths, now they grind my gears big time! and people that think Novas look good with bodykits, they tense me up so much i get one bloodshot eye!

uuuummmm yeah that'll do for now

JuvUK

You may want to try amiga XL, get QNX and i'll walk you through the steps to get a high powered MIGGY!!!! Imagine a 2 GHZ 68040 Amiga 1200. yay!!!!
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

@ TheCorfiot

F'k me Bas! - Seriously hard-core m8y! :pint:

@ Dreamcast270mhz

You can with WinUAE. :shhh:

Kin
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

WinUAE and windoze suck compared to e-uae and linux (X-amiga) or else. Amiga XL which virtually supports all hardware supported by qnx. NT kernel is outdayed and windowz will never be able to keep up with such a bad base. The UNIX kernels far surpass the memory management of windows. I have 1GB of RAM in my desktop and if I run UT2004, it won't touch the 200meg of RAM left, it eats my paging file. Thats why i turned it off. hah! WinUAE also doesn't give you an option to turn off the chipset like Amiga XL or in Amithlon's case: keeps it off.
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Dreamcast270mhz said:
<snip> UNIX kernels far surpass the memory management of windows. I have 1GB of RAM in my desktop and if I run UT2004, it won't touch the 200meg of RAM left, it eats my paging file. Thats why i turned it off.

Mickey Mouses' little finger surpasses the memory management of Windows! - Joking aside, optimise your SWAP file on the Pee Cee. Turn off Hibernation; turn off System Restore; Turn off Alternate Text Services; Open msconfig selecting the StartUp TAB & turn everything off in there! You could loose Virus protection but if your behind a Firewall & just gaming, you'll have a load more real memory to hand. :D
Then..... optimise the swap file. Set minimum & maximum amounts to exactly 2.5 times your Ram. The maximum under XP32bit is 4082Mb (even on an NTFS filesystem). So 2.5 x 1024 = 2560Mb. Also if you can, set the SWAP file off your 'C' drive & to another Partition or Hard Drive. If you're on Raid, use another Partition other than 'C'. If you only have 'C' :nono: , optimising your SWAP file will save fragmenting your 'C' partition to bits, 'cos the minimum & maximum sizes set @ your 2560, means it reamains a constant size! :thumbsup:

If you do move the SWAP file from 'C', be sure to delete all the temp files in all computer Account names, not just the All Users. You can also delete any files in the Winows/Temp folder. A couple might not go for whatever things you have running in the background so ignore them & leave them in place.

Then have a good de-frag.

Sorry if I confused you or bored you, but you should see a difference in your entire systems performance! :mrgreen:

Kin
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

I have enough RAM that my stripped down xp kernel can run what I need. I play a few good games, got a g5200 FX 128 PCI so I'm good on Vram and sound, so I really don't need swap, I always have had no swap under XP and I have no interest in returning to that page, but thanks for the info.
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

TheCorfiot said:
HiFi Stereo was actually a frequency modulated subcarrier that was interleaved within the helical layered video signal on the tape, The extra heads required to read & decode the HiFi Stereo signal were also mounted on the helical rotating drum phase shifted from the video signal heads by 'x degrees.
This could be proved as adjusting the tracking control to extremes ( helical drum fine speed adjust ) would also cause the HiFi tracks to dropout as well as cause video interference.

That is true for later VHS, however most of the first hifi VHS recorders split the mono track into two smaller tracks for the stereo. It caused background hiss and wasn't great quality, so was scrapped when depth multiplexing was invented. This method was developed because there was no room left on the tape width to fit the stereo tracks separately to the video track. The audio head laid down the audio stereo tracks a fraction of a second before the video, which was then laid over the top of the hifi audio track. And on playback the video and audio heads ignore each other's signals, giving true hi-fi stereo on VHS.

And interestingly JVC stole the idea of depth multiplexing from Sony, who developed it a year earlier for the PAL version of Betamax. US Betamax didn't use this method. The NTSC Hi-Fi Betamax recorders used frequency multiplexing, placing a pair of FM carriers between the chroma and luminance carriers, with each head having a pair of carriers, so the tape held 4 FM carries and therefore 4 channels for audio. However PAL required more bandwidth than NTSC and there wasn't room to use this method so Sony developed depth multiplexing to embed the audio beneath the video.

However this causes a problem when editing and dubbing a tape for both VHS and Betamax. Because the hifi track is under the video track, you cannot dub over the video without replacing the hi-fi track. And you cannot dub to the hi-fi track without destroying the video. So to fix this problem the original mono track remained on most hi-fi recorders for dubbing in other audio onto existing recordings. Not the best solution, but it was was still useful for a soundtrack or commentary.

Not sure how interested anyone really is, but with SVHS pro editing decks actually recorded two linear audio tracks above the video track that were separate and could be dubbed or changed without effecting the hifi audio and video. Normally one of these tracks remained the mono audio track for dubbing, and the second was used to record LTC time code. However my Panasonic SVHS pro edit decks record VITC timecode which leaves the audio tracks alone and records the time code in the vertical interval of the video between each frame. Quite a cool timecode system and more accurate than LTC. However my Panasonic decks could also still access and control LTC/RCTC based players as well as VITC ones. Quite a unique and useful feature at the time as my Sony Hi8 camcorder used RCTC.

I preferred the use of a High Quality HiFi Stereo VHS machine for Audio recordings instead of compact cassettes.

Me too. And later I preferred to make audio recordings via hi8 camcorder, and then mini dv, which I often still use.
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Dreamcast270mhz said:
I have enough RAM that my stripped down xp kernel can run what I need. I play a few good games, got a g5200 FX 128 PCI so I'm good on Vram and sound, so I really don't need swap, I always have had no swap under XP and I have no interest in returning to that page, but thanks for the info.

Bill Gates idea of an OS requires a SWAP file in order to function correctly. It's part of the OS. Just about every game & application uses SWAP file space, irrespective of the amount of physical ram in your Pee Cee. You are seriously depreciating your Pee Cee's performance by not using a SWAP file.

Kin
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

With the sudden recent affordability of large amounts of ram, more and more people are added 4GB to their systems, and I've read many people's posts recently around various forums saying that now they have 4GB+ of ram they have disabled the swap file. However, as Kin said, Vista (and all other versions of Windows) are designed to use a swap file regardless of the amount of ram the system contains. Therefore it should never be fully disabled. However with 4GB or more it should work OK if set to a fixed size of 512MB.

It might all appear to work fine with the swap file disabled, but it could be slowing the system down, and it will stop some games and other programs from working depending on how they are written because some programmers code their software to take advantage of the swap file.
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Harrison said:
TheCorfiot said:
HiFi Stereo was actually a frequency modulated subcarrier that was interleaved within the helical layered video signal on the tape, The extra heads required to read & decode the HiFi Stereo signal were also mounted on the helical rotating drum phase shifted from the video signal heads by 'x degrees.
This could be proved as adjusting the tracking control to extremes ( helical drum fine speed adjust ) would also cause the HiFi tracks to dropout as well as cause video interference.

That is true for later VHS, however most of the first hifi VHS recorders split the mono track into two smaller tracks for the stereo. It caused background hiss and wasn't great quality, so was scrapped when depth multiplexing was invented. This method was developed because there was no room left on the tape width to fit the stereo tracks separately to the video track. The audio head laid down the audio stereo tracks a fraction of a second before the video, which was then laid over the top of the hifi audio track. And on playback the video and audio heads ignore each other's signals, giving true hi-fi stereo on VHS.

And interestingly JVC stole the idea of depth multiplexing from Sony, who developed it a year earlier for the PAL version of Betamax. US Betamax didn't use this method. The NTSC Hi-Fi Betamax recorders used frequency multiplexing, placing a pair of FM carriers between the chroma and luminance carriers, with each head having a pair of carriers, so the tape held 4 FM carries and therefore 4 channels for audio. However PAL required more bandwidth than NTSC and there wasn't room to use this method so Sony developed depth multiplexing to embed the audio beneath the video.

However this causes a problem when editing and dubbing a tape for both VHS and Betamax. Because the hifi track is under the video track, you cannot dub over the video without replacing the hi-fi track. And you cannot dub to the hi-fi track without destroying the video. So to fix this problem the original mono track remained on most hi-fi recorders for dubbing in other audio onto existing recordings. Not the best solution, but it was was still useful for a soundtrack or commentary.

Not sure how interested anyone really is, but with SVHS pro editing decks actually recorded two linear audio tracks above the video track that were separate and could be dubbed or changed without effecting the hifi audio and video. Normally one of these tracks remained the mono audio track for dubbing, and the second was used to record LTC time code. However my Panasonic SVHS pro edit decks record VITC timecode which leaves the audio tracks alone and records the time code in the vertical interval of the video between each frame. Quite a cool timecode system and more accurate than LTC. However my Panasonic decks could also still access and control LTC/RCTC based players as well as VITC ones. Quite a unique and useful feature at the time as my Sony Hi8 camcorder used RCTC.

I preferred the use of a High Quality HiFi Stereo VHS machine for Audio recordings instead of compact cassettes.

Me too. And later I preferred to make audio recordings via hi8 camcorder, and then mini dv, which I often still use.
Well, with all this talk about HiFi Stero on VHS, where does NICAM Stereo fit in to all this?
I was led to believer (not 100% sure if this is correct) is that HiFi Stereo stored an analogue signal, where as NICAM was a digital signal recorded on to the tape :?
Anybody know the true answer?
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

woodycool said:
I was led to believer (not 100% sure if this is correct) is that HiFi Stereo stored an analogue signal, where as NICAM was a digital signal recorded on to the tape :?
Anybody know the true answer?

All your BBC NICAM answers here: Linky

Kin
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

@Harrison.

The Linear 2 track Stereo system was never branded as "HiFi Stereo", as all of VHS's little innovations & improvements over the years, these newly introduced technologies were all separately licensed to the VCR manufacturer's in order for them to include the feature in their Video Recorder.
Trust me as a designer at the time HiFi Stereo was the FM Helical system, before that was std 2 track linear Stereo (low frequency response) which was read by a separate audio head and simply branded as Stereo or Dolby Stereo if a Dolby "B" type encoder / decoder was also fitted (same technology as audio cassette version).

@woody.

NICAM (Near Instantaneous Companded Audio Multiplex) was the method used to receive & decode Stereo audio (or bilingual audio) in the UK & Europe via the RF or Terrestrial TV transmitters. Introduced 1989-1991. In the UK this complimented the 6MHz "Mono" subcarrier FM audio, In Europe it replaced the Dual 5.5 & 5.74 "Stereo" dual subcarrier FM audio as the EU had enjoyed FM stereo on their TV's for many years already.
This decoded digital Stereo signal was then recorded to the Video tape using the HiFi Stereo FM system and played back in the same manner as already existing HiFi Stereo VCR's.

Some very cheap and nasty VCR's of the time (Matsui's - Dixons) Had the cheek to sell Nicam VCR's (Nicam needed no License) but due to the fact that they did not want to License the HiFi Stereo system used the older 2 track linear Stereo system to record & playback the decoded Digital audio, basically defeating the whole point of receiving the much higher quality digital broadcast. :nuts:
By then of course buyer's were just looking for the Nicam logo but should have been looking for both Nicam & HiFi Stereo... :banghead:

Regards
TC :pint:


edit ---- @Kinny Just seen your linky, very nice indeed. 8)
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

wwhhooooaaaa!!!
WTF happened to my thread? i don't recall naming it "Which Hi-FI VCR magazine roundup review issue"

and while I'm at it TC I'm shocked at you!! after the times you've shown me this :offtopic: and then deleted my post! only to see you here off topicing with the others, i mean where's the justice?

only kidding all, it's a very informative thread :)

JuvUK
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

....And none of this would have been possible without the work of Ray Dolby on slant-azimuth recording, a method that allowed video to be recorded on narrower tape without sacrificing quality.
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

JuvUK said:
wwhhooooaaaa!!!
WTF happened to my thread? i don't recall naming it "Which Hi-FI VCR magazine roundup review issue"

and while I'm at it TC I'm shocked at you!! after the times you've shown me this :offtopic: and then deleted my post! only to see you here off topicing with the others, i mean where's the justice?

only kidding all, it's a very informative thread :)

JuvUK

:thumbsup2: PMSL I was reading through thinking exactly the same :-)
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

@ JuvUK

It might go against the grain a bit from a fashion perspective, but I suggest thet you put a comfortable beige cardigan and some slippers on, light up a pipe and join in the Hi-Fi discussions.

:ROTFLOL2:
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

There was a video editing program for the Amiga (sorry I can't remember the name of it now - still installed on one of my HDs) that used the mono sound track on a video tape to allow editing by replacing the mono sound track with a time code.

This was a combination of software/hardware system.

You had to have your video recorders modified to allow dubbing/reading the mono sound track seperate to the stero track.

Then by using the time code you could trigger events to control everything from mixing video output with a panasonic mixer deck, multiple VCRs, playing music, scala titles, video disc players and anything else that had an Arexx port :bowdown:

I used this system for years until I moved to the Casablanca (£4000+) and eventually the poxy PC system (£70 of software) I use now :sigh:

End of another history lesson :ROTFLOL2:

Dave G 8)
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Kin Hell said:
woodycool said:
I was led to believer (not 100% sure if this is correct) is that HiFi Stereo stored an analogue signal, where as NICAM was a digital signal recorded on to the tape :?
Anybody know the true answer?
All your BBC NICAM answers here: Linky
Kin
Cheers Kinny.
It makes for interesting reading :)
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Merlin said:
@ JuvUK

It might go against the grain a bit from a fashion perspective, but I suggest thet you put a comfortable beige cardigan and some slippers on, light up a pipe and join in the Hi-Fi discussions.

:ROTFLOL2:

actually, i quite like to smoke a pipe now and again, but my wife hates it because she says i'm not old enough to smoke a pipe yet. damn my cursed good looks and youthful appearance! :ROTFLOL2:
 
Re: nothing f'ing works!!!

Grow a big woolly beard, don some open toed sandals with grey socks, and you will fit right in with the pipe smoking fraternity. ;) Either that or get a part in the next run of Jesus Christ Superstar!
 
Back
Top Bottom