I've never got on with Apple products, and probably never will. I just don't like how they do things.
That said, I do recommend Apple products to the less technically minded friends and relatives. It's range of products are perfect for those who aren't interested in, or can't, sort out their own tech lives.
As long as they can afford it, of course.
I will continue to look elsewhere for my own personal tech as I balk at the prices they ask, I just don't think they reflect good value for money.

I was just thinking... isn't the iPod Touch really a 4" iPad?
And really, where does the touch fit into the product line these days?
Yeah, and the really ironic thing is that the iPod Touch trounces the iPad Mini technically. Don't get why they didn't put iPhone 5 tech in the mini. Even though the A6 isn't the most up to date technically (still dual core), at least its not 2011 and runs above 1GHz.
The only logical reason is price, but if this tech was in an Android tab it would be £49 max.
I'm a Windows XP die-hard, but I will say that OSX is hands-down the most pleasant Unix I've ever tried.I far prefer Macs over Windows or Linux systems for desktop use. The experience is just so much nicer. It's hard to quantify, but the whole look and feel of Mac OS just feels much cleaner, simpler and more elegant than anything else.
I'd agree that Macs are probably better for "less technically-minded" people than a Windows or Linux system would be, but I don't think that therefore implies they are no good for "more technically-minded" people....
iRetrOVolver, It would be nice if occasionally someone who enjoys their tech products wouldn't get so defensive, assume criticism where none exists, and then attack other platforms with cliched arguments.![]()
That's good to know. At least they haven't decided to cash in by restricting apps to single device activation.